Cases 51 - 60 of 88
WILLIAMS v. Lanier County Sheriff's Department et al
as 7:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
DERRICK A WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LANIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CHARLES N NORTON, JOHN OLSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
White v. Franklin et al
as 4:2014cv00242
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keith White
Defendant:
Herbert E. (Buzz) Franklin, Allan Norton, Mellisa Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. First Multiple Listing Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:
First Multiple Listing Services, Inc., Cantey Pace Davis, W. Scott Askew, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Norton v. Begley et al
as 2:2013cv00063
Plaintiff:
Derek Norton
Defendant:
Melissa Begley, Kelly Roberts and Grace Akon
Rochard v. Gwinnett County et al
as 1:2012cv02648
Plaintiff:
Darnell Rochard
Defendant:
Gwinnett County, Dawson Jackson, Daniel J. Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAFT v. Hart County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
RAYFONDIA NASHAN CRAFT
Defendant:
Hart County Sheriff's Department, MIKE CLEVELAND, MARSHALL NORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kilpatrick et al v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv01658
Plaintiff:
Earl Kilpatrick and Demetrius Kilpatrick
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia , Steven O'Neil Orr , Terry Jerome and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Walden v. Henry County Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00899
Plaintiff:
James Mickey Walden
Defendant:
Henry County Police Department, Robert P. Hohenstein, Joey Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
