Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Veley v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2011cv01284
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and Naphcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nancy Veley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Sheriff, CCDC et al
as 2:2011cv00922
Plaintiff:
William Mitchell Bell
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, MD Keith Courtney, Dr. Essex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mwanza v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00471
Defendant:
Augustus, Cornelius, Naphcare, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tacuma Mwanza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cheryl et al
as 2:2011cv00291
Defendant:
Cheryl, Clark County, Deputy Chief and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bourmaian v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2010cv02233
Plaintiff:
Vartkes Bourmaian
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, Douglas Gillespie, Meier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pullano v Clark County Detention et al
as 2:2010cv00335
Defendant:
Arb, Mary Brammer, CCDC Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry v. Naphcare, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00790
Plaintiff:
Joseph Henry
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez, et al., v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, et al.
as 2:2010cv00684
Defendant:
Doe Correction Officers, Doe Health Care Provider, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Edilzon Dennis Gonzalez, Jorge Gonzalez and Mario Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clemons v. Naphcare, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00406
:
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadus v. Naphcare Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01703
Plaintiff:
Hollie Broadus
Defendant:
Naphcare Inc and McGrory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
