Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Deraven v. Waterbury et al
as 3:2008cv00665
Plaintiff:
Andy Deraven
Defendant:
City of Waterbury, Neil O'Leary, Brendan Alis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shuckra v. Roberts et al
as 3:2008cv00262
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shuckra
Defendant:
Daryl K. Roberts, Neil Dryfe, Jose L. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008mc00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
New Stream Real Est, LLC v. Porter et al
as 3:2007cv01463
Plaintiff:
New Stream Real Est, LLC
Defendant:
Anthony Porter, Stephan Rayborn, Harold Lee Farthing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kildea v. Canterbury et al
as 3:2007cv00942
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Kildea
Defendant:
Town of Canterbury, Neil A. Dupont, SR., Christopher C. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Morneau v. State of CT et al
as 3:2007cv00819
Plaintiff:
Ricky A. Morneau
Defendant:
State of CT, Louis Aresco, Louis Corneroli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Derfler v. Randt
as 3:2007cv00728
Plaintiff:
Neil Derfler
Defendant:
Clark T. Randt, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ervin v. O'Leary
as 3:2007cv00588
Plaintiff:
Rembert Ervin
Defendant:
Neil O'Leary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wright v. Waterbury et al
as 3:2007cv00306
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wright
Defendant:
City of Waterbury, Michael Jarjura, Waterbury Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mason et al v. Barbieri et al
as 3:2007cv00287
Plaintiff:
Larry Mason and Modesto Rodriguez
Defendant:
John Barbieri, Brian Hobart, Jon Gallup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
