Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Gaye Schaffart v. ONEOK
as 11-1061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gaye Lynn Schaffart
Defendant - Appellee:
ONEOK, Inc.
Jerry Peters v. ONEOK
as 10-3862
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jerry Peters
Defendant - Appellant:
ONEOK, Inc.
Gaye Schaffart v. ONEOK
as 10-3861
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Gaye Lynn Schaffart
Defendant - Appellant:
ONEOK, Inc.
Ashe et al v. Oneok Partners, G.P., LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00868
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Ashe , John Handshoe , Samantha E. Handshoe and others
Defendant:
Oneok Partners, G.P., LLC , Appalachian Pipeline Contractors, L.P. LLP, Austin Powder, Inc, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Retirement Plan for the Employees of ONEOK, Inc. and Subsidiaries, The v. Green
as 4:2010cv00389
Plaintiff:
Retirement Plan for the Employees of ONEOK, Inc. and Subsidiaries, The
Defendant:
Brenda L. Green
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Roberts et al v. Chesapeake Operating, Inc et al
as 6:2004cv01233
Plaintiff:
Virginia R. Roberts , Edward D. Robbins, Jr , Frederick W. Gallup and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Operating, Inc and ONEOK Resources Company
Pecial_master:
Dennis Gillen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Schaffart v. ONEOK, Inc.
as 8:2009cv00367
Plaintiff:
Gaye Lynn Schaffart
Defendant:
ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Peters v. ONEOK, Inc.
as 8:2009cv00368
Plaintiff:
Jerry Peters
Defendant:
ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
ONEOK, Inc. v. Micro Focus (US) Inc.
as 4:2009cv00614
Plaintiff:
ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK, Inc.
Defendant:
Micro Focus (US) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
ONEOK, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00597
Plaintiff:
ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK, Inc.
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
