Cases 51 - 60 of 131
Pearson et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana et al
as 1:2017cv04028
Plaintiff:
David Pearson and Elizabeth Pearson
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana and Big Red Construction Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pearson v. Augusta, Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv00123
Plaintiff:
Melinda Beazley Pearson
Defendant:
Augusta, Georgia , Fred Russell and William Shanahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Safeco Insurance Co. of Indiana v. Pearson et al
as 1:2017cv03335
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Co. of Indiana
Defendant:
David Pearson and Elizabeth Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Pearson et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana et al
as 1:2017cv02246
Plaintiff:
David Pearson and Elizabeth Pearson
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana and Big Red Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DIEGO v. SPIVEY, et al
as 3:2017cv00089
Plaintiff:
ALISSA DIEGO
Defendant:
PHILLIP SPIVEY, SHARON WILLIS, DONNIE HARRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Lee Arrendale State Prison
as 2:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
Sandtoro E. Pearson
Defendant:
Lee Arrendale State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. The City of Atlanta, Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv00519
Plaintiff:
Mildred Ann Sims
Defendant:
The City of Atlanta, Georgia , Patrick L. Labat , Major Lecounte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEARSON v. GEORGIA
as 4:2017cv00002
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS CAINE PEARSON
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Office of Personnel Management et al
as 1:2016cv02862
Plaintiff:
Bennie R. Richardson
Defendant:
Office of Personnel Management, Beth F. Colbert, Karen Ahuja and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Pearson v. Superior Court of Douglas County et al
as 1:2016cv02615
Plaintiff:
Tommy Pearson
Defendant:
Superior Court of Douglas County, State of Georgia and DA McDay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
