Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Pearson v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2013cv00254
Plaintiff:
Carroll A. Pearson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Honeycutt v. Pearson
as 6:2013cv00237
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Honeycutt
Respondent:
Charles Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Farmer v. Pearson
as 6:2013cv00224
Petitioner:
Rodney E Farmer
Respondent:
Charles Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Farmer v. Pearson et al
as 6:2013cv00221
Plaintiff:
Rodney E Farmer
Defendant:
Charles Pearson, Alicia Littlefield and Tulsa County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Pearson
as 6:2013cv00196
Petitioner:
Rick Lee Buchanan
Respondent:
Charles Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Howard v. Pearson
as 6:2013cv00115
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Nigel Howard
Respondent:
Charles Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kennedy v. Muskogee County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 6:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
Jason Mitchell Kennedy
Defendant:
Muskogee County Board of County Commissioners and Charles Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mead v. Pearson
as 6:2013cv00086
Petitioner:
Rodney Glen Mead
Respondent:
Charles Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wright et al v. Muskogee County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 6:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Wright and Charles Wright
Defendant:
Muskogee County Board of County Commissioners, Charles Pearson, Kent Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
