Cases 51 - 60 of 311
Sykes v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01252
Petitioner:
Overtis Sykes
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fisher v. Pekin Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Doug Fisher
Defendant:
Pekin Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jolley v. Pekin Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv01060
Plaintiff:
Logan Jolley
Defendant:
Pekin Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Swopes v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01192
Petitioner:
Sherman Swopes
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hull v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01173
Petitioner:
Daniel R Hull
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hall v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01169
Petitioner:
Chadwick Danylo Hall
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gotschall v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01154
Petitioner:
Joanna L Gotschall
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. McInerney Builders, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02052
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
McInerney Builders, Inc., Chubb National Insurance Company a/s/o Caryl Dillon, Pekin Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Doyle v. Pekin Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Taylor Doyle
Defendant:
Pekin Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Wardle v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01127
Petitioner:
Patsy Wardle
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
