Cases 51 - 57 of 57
National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (NAAMJP) et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2011cv05481
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (NAAMJP) , Brandon M. Felton , Jose J. Garcia and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Obama, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gray v. Hamilton et al
as 3:2010cv04614
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee Gray
Defendant:
Phyllis J. Hamilton and Richard W. Wieking
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2009cv01181
Plaintiff:
Adam McDonald
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States District Court, Northern District of California, Phyllis J. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McDonald v. The United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv01181
Plaintiff:
Adam McDonald
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States District Court, Northern District of California, Phyllis J. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McDonald v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2009cv01181
Plaintiff:
Adam McDonald
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States District Court, Northern District of California, Phyllis J. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Boustred et al v. Government and County of Santa Cruz et.al.
as 5:2008cv00546
Plaintiff:
Clive Frank Boustred, RCB, WFB and others
Defendant:
Government and County of Santa Cruz, Government and State of California, Government of the United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rodriguez v. Hamilton
as 3:2007cv03518
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Phyllis J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
