Cases 51 - 60 of 192
Blume et al v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation
as 1:2018cv12251
Defendant:
Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation
Plaintiff:
Thomas Blume and Jason Martinez
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
GARRAMUNO v. PORT AUTHORITY OFNEW YORK & NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv17421
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OFNEW YORK & NEW JERSEY, PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON CORP., ABC CORP. 1-10 (fictitious companies) and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN GARRAMUNO
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Kay v. Port Authority Trans Hudson Corp.
as 1:2018cv11327
Defendant:
Port Authority Trans Hudson Corp.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kay
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MCALLISTER v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv14927
Defendant:
ABC CORP. 1-10, JOHN DOES 1-10, PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CLEMENTE v. PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP.
as 2:2018cv13070
Plaintiff:
Ronald Clemente
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
KMEC v. PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP.
as 2:2018cv12492
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP.
Plaintiff:
JESSE KMEC
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Chiaracane et al v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv02995
Defendant:
Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation , Robert Kuhfahl and Vincent Lombardi
Plaintiff:
Michael Chiaracane and Luis Maldonaldo
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Doyle v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation
as 1:2018cv02316
Plaintiff:
Harry B Doyle
Defendant:
Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 56
TALLENT v. PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP.
as 2:2018cv02295
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TALLENT
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
HRIC-MATIS v. PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP.
as 2:2018cv01981
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER HRIC-MATIS
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
