Cases 51 - 60 of 232
Murphy v. Pretrial Services et al
as 6:2020cv00780
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Defendant:
9th Cir. Federal Court and Pretrial Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Kasubhai
as 6:2020cv00781
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Defendant:
Judge Mustafa Kasubhai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2020cv00764
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Officer Pennington and Officer MacDonald
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2020cv00767
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Springfield Missouri Medical Center Federal Prisoners
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Brown
as 6:2020cv00766
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Defendant:
Lisa Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Columbia Sportswear N.A. Inc. v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, et al
as 20-35381
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT DENIKE, ROBERT MURPHY, 'Bob', SEIRUS INNOVATIVE ACCESSORIES, INC., a Utah corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR NORTH AMERICA, INC., an Oregon corporation
Defendant:
VENTEX CO., LTD., a foreign company, MAN-SIK (PAUL) PARK, an individual, JOHN DOE, 1 through 5 and others
Thomas Murphy v. USA
as 20-35358
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS ROBERT MURPHY
Thomas Murphy v. Lake County
as 20-35356
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS ROBERT MURPHY
Defendant / Appellee:
LAKE COUNTY
Daniell v. CMH Services Inc et al
as 9:2020cv01206
Defendant:
CMH Services Inc, Clayton Homes, Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Myra Daniell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Davis v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 20-15304
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN LEO DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
TROY COLLON, HS388, physician assistant, CHS, TRACY JONES, Medication Nurse at CHS, BENJAMIN FISK, Detention Officer, A9464 and others
Defendant:
STEVE GALLARDO, STEVE CHUCRI, KARAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
