Cases 51 - 60 of 74
UBS Bank USA et al v. Morales et al
as 2:2014cv00561
Plaintiff:
UBS Bank USA and Steven Stewart
Defendant:
Carlos Gonzalez Morales, Hilda Rodriguez Forteza and Hilda A. Lopez Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
UBS Bank USA v. Rodriguez
as 2:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
UBS Bank USA
Defendant:
Iris M. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Accelerated Marketing Group et al
as 2:2013cv00600
Plaintiff:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Accelerated Marketing Group, Utah Division of Consumer Protection, Richard E. Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
A Plus Auto Center et al v. USA
as 2:2012mc01085
Petitioner:
A Plus Auto Center , Fernando Garcia-Rodriguez and Ebelina Valadez-Izarraraz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
ITN Flix v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
ITN Flix
Defendant:
Robert Rodriguez, Machete Kills, Gloria Hinojosa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Rodriguez v. USA
as 2:2012cv01017
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Felix Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rodriguez v. Law Offices of Kirk A. Cullimore et al
as 2:2012cv00767
Plaintiff:
Eugenia Rodriguez
Defendant:
Law Offices of Kirk A. Cullimore and Kirk A. Cullimore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rodriguez v. Garden et al
as 2:2012cv00670
Plaintiff:
Frank Rodriguez
Defendant:
Richard Garden, Kennon Tubbs and Joseph Coombs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
