Cases 51 - 60 of 84
Santiago v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00770
Plaintiff:
Rosa Santiago
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Thompson v. Esserman et al
as 3:2013cv01059
Plaintiff:
Robert Thompson
Defendant:
Dean Esserman, Johnson, J. Murpht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Klaneski v. Saint Francis Care Inc.
as 3:2013cv00991
Plaintiff:
Rosa Lee Klaneski
Defendant:
Saint Francis Care Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Klaneski v. Saint Francis Care Inc.
as 2:2013cv00971
Plaintiff:
Rosa Lee Klaneski
Defendant:
Saint Francis Care Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Esteban v. Santa Rosa Restaurant, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00963
Plaintiff:
Reyna Hernandez Esteban
Defendant:
Santa Rosa Restaurant, LLC, Alfredo Francisco Rivas and Juana Rivas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Freshpoint Connecticut, LLC v. Rosa Brothers, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00684
Plaintiff:
Freshpoint Connecticut, LLC
Defendant:
Rosa Brothers, Inc. , Raymond F. Rosa , Ronald M. Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Traylor v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2013cv00663
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Traylor
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Connecticut General Assembly, Eric D. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roman v. Vibberts et al
as 3:2013cv00304
Plaintiff:
Neftali R. Roman
Defendant:
Rosa Vibberts and Ana Paterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
