Cases 51 - 60 of 84
Monical v. Winters et al
as 1:2017cv00476
Defendant:
Anderson, Sgt. Beane, Deputy Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley William Monical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neyman-Reese v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv00436
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Margaret Anne Neyman-Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Quarles El et al v. Reese et al
as 3:2017cv00007
Respondent:
Michael Marshman and Michael Reese
Petitioner:
Allando Quarles El and Lastephanie Robinson Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reese v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2016cv02405
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Chad Michael Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Douglas v. Reese et al
as 6:2016cv00048
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe and Donald Reese
Plaintiff:
Dameion Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway v. Portland Police Bureau et al
as 3:2015cv00712
Defendant:
City of Portland, Charlie Hales, Portland Police Bureau and others
Plaintiff:
Theresa Daniele Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
West v. Hales et al
as 3:2015cv00715
Defendant:
Mayor Hales, ISO Officers and Police Chief Reese
Plaintiff:
Robert West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reese v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv01394
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Charles Craig Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DeWalt Productions, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission et al
as 3:2014cv01017
Defendant:
Officer Charles Asheim, City of Portland, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
DeWalt Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
