Cases 51 - 60 of 325
Rojas-Rico v. USA
as 5:2018cv00163
Respondent:
USA
Plaintiff:
Hugo Adrian Rojas-Rico
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114
Dukes v. Brody et al
as 3:2018cv02189
Plaintiff:
Rico Cortez Dukes
Defendant:
Mick Meyers, Shanklin Brody, Sherry Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. AA Bail Bonds Denton et al
as 3:2018cv01986
Plaintiff:
Rico Cortez Dukes
Defendant:
AA Bail Bonds Denton and Denton County Court and Jail
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Duffy-Thompson v. Collier et al
as 4:2018cv01919
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Duffy-Thompson
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Tony O'Hare, Roberto M Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Marquez et al v. F&A Drywall Construction, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv01731
Plaintiff:
Carlos Marquez , Francisco Perez and Gustavo Rico
Defendant:
F&A Drywall Construction, Inc. and Francisco Lopez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rico v. USA
as 4:2018cv00048
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ismael Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Singh Metals, LLC v. Edwards et al
as 4:2017cv03869
Plaintiff:
Singh Metals, LLC
Defendant:
Mike Edwards, Avenir Recycling Inc., Steve Yu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ghayalod v. Dufossat Capital Puerto Rico, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv03553
Plaintiff:
Manoj Ghayalod
Defendant:
Dufossat Capital Puerto Rico, LLC and Ashton Soniat
Counter_claimant:
Dufossat Capital Puerto Rico, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Pallavi Ghayalod
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
MER GROUP PUERTO RICO LLC et al v. PARAGON DRILLING SERVICES 7 LLC et al
as 4:2017cv03144
Plaintiff:
MER Group Puerto Rico LLC and MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
Paragon Drilling Services 7 LLC and PARAGON ASSEST COMPANY LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
