Cases 51 - 60 of 83
Oglesby v. Nobels et al
as 5:2014cv00098
Petitioner:
Jerry Rollins Oglesby
Respondent:
Greg Nobels, Steve C. Sikes and Randy F. Royal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Oglesby v. Nobles et al
as 2:2014cv00162
Petitioner:
Jerry Rollins Oglesby
Respondent:
Greg Nobles, Steve Sikes and Tom Durden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Rollins et al
as 1:2014cv03024
Plaintiff:
Dennis Brown
Defendant:
Kinte Rollins, Leonard Mapp and Charles Valner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rollins v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv02991
Plaintiff:
Danielle Deaton Rollins
Defendant:
Ricky Johnson, Darryl Henderson and Anthony Volley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry v. Rollins, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02561
Plaintiff:
Lisa Barry
Defendant:
Rollins, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Rollin Rockett, IV
as 3:2013mi00002
Plaintiff:
SE Property Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Rollin Rockett, IV
SEVERN PEANUT CO INC et al v. INDUSTRIAL FUMIGANT CO
as 7:2012mc00004
Plaintiff:
SEVERN PEANUT CO INC
Defendant:
INDUSTRIAL FUMIGANT COMPANY and Rollins, Inc.
Movant:
Tifton Quality Peanuts LLC
Farm Credit of Northwest Florida, ACA v. R&B Construction of South Alabama, Inc. et al
as 3:2012mi00002
Plaintiff:
Farm Credit of Northwest Florida, ACA
Defendant:
R&B Construction of South Alabama, Inc. and Rollin Rockett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Preetorius et al v. Morris Publishing Group, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01757
Plaintiff:
Regina Marie Preetorius , Marie Champagne and Charles Gregory Preetorius
Defendant:
Morris Publishing Group, LLC, Morris Communications Holding Company, LLC, Morris Communications Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rollins v. Whitfield County Detention Center et al
as 4:2011cv00087
Plaintiff:
Robert Vernon Rollins
Defendant:
Whitfield County Detention Center and Quarles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
