Cases 51 - 60 of 104
CLEMENS v. WARDEN SCI GREENE et al
as 2:2016cv04820
Plaintiff:
LARRY DELROY CLEMENS
Defendant:
WARDEN SCI GREENE, WARDEN SCI GRATERFORD, WARDEN SCI CAMP HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. PA Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00575
Plaintiff:
David Carter
Defendant:
PA Department of Corrections, SCI - Camp Hill, Unknown Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. SCI Camp Hill et al
as 1:2016cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jahki Lynn Bell
Defendant:
SCI Camp Hill and Laurel Harry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMPSON v. PA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2016cv00239
Petitioner:
CHALMERS A. SIMPSON, JR.
Respondent:
PA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and SCI CAMP HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROOKING v. D.O.C. AND EMPLOYEES AT SCI CAMP HILL et al
as 3:2015cv02134
Plaintiff:
MARCUS DION BROOKING
Defendant:
D.O.C. AND EMPLOYEES AT SCI CAMP HILL, Zobitne, Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. KANE et al
as 2:2015cv05375
Petitioner:
TODD A. WILSON
Respondent:
KATHLEEN KANE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA and WARDEN SCI CAMP HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Kane et al
as 3:2015cv01789
Petitioner:
Todd A. Wilson
Respondent:
Kathleen Kane, Attorney General of PA and Warden SCI Camp Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROOKING v. D.O.C. AND EMPLOYEES AT SCI CAMP HILL et al
as 2:2015cv04767
Plaintiff:
MARCUS DION BROOKING
Defendant:
D.O.C. AND EMPLOYEES AT SCI CAMP HILL, ZOBITNE, HARRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Von Smith v. Warden SCI Camp Hill et al
as 3:2015cv01067
Petitioner:
William Von Smith
Respondent:
Warden SCI Camp Hill and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Snider v. Pennsylvania DOC et al
as 4:2015cv00951
Plaintiff:
Joel Snider
Defendant:
Pennsylvania DOC, SCI Coal Township, SCI Graterford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
