Cases 51 - 60 of 90
Huff v. Lincoln County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2018cv00683
Defendant:
Lincoln County Sheriff's Office, Jean LNU, Kelly George and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wallace Huff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto v. Garfield County Sheriffs Office et al
as 5:2018cv00128
Plaintiff:
Curry J Soto
Defendant:
Garfield County Sheriffs Office, FNU Niles, FNU Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Osage County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
Sean M Franklin
Defendant:
Osage County Sheriffs Office and Osage County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kauble v. Oklahoma County Sheriff Office et al
as 5:2017cv00729
Plaintiff:
Harold Kauble
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Sheriff Office and John Whetsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cyr v. Oklahoma County Sheriff Office et al
as 5:2017cv00422
Plaintiff:
Joseph R Cyr
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Sheriff Office and Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Alfalfa County Sheriff Office
as 5:2016cv01248
Plaintiff:
Anthony Blake Washington, Jr
Defendant:
Alfalfa County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Alfalfa County Sheriff Office
as 6:2016cv00227
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Washington
Defendant:
Alfalfa County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackwell v. Bank of America N.A. et al
as 4:2016cv00133
Plaintiff:
Malcolm M Blackwell
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A. and Tulsa County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Aramark Company et al
as 4:2014cv00607
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Deon Moore
Defendant:
Aramark Company and Tulsa County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillard v. Latimer County Oklahoma et al
as 6:2014cv00309
Plaintiff:
Frank Dillard, Jr.
Defendant:
Latimer County Oklahoma, Jessie James and Latimer County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
