Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Witter et al
as 4:2011cv00705
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Stacey A Witter, Traci G Witter and Time Investments, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hemphill v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv01192
Plaintiff:
Stacey L Hemphill
Defendant:
Justin Jones, L L Young, Carmen Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Inhofe v. Boettcher & Lobaugh, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00624
Plaintiff:
Tara A Inhofe
Defendant:
Boettcher & Lobaugh, Inc. , Thomas D Boettcher and Stacey A Lobaugh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Ward et al v. Toyota Motor Insurance Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv00230
Plaintiff:
Stacey Ward and Jason Ward
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Insurance Services, Inc. , Toyota Motor Credit Corporation , Toyota Motor Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Fowler Toyota, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Toyota Motor Insurance Services, Inc. and GS Administrators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ward v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 4:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Stacey Leon Ward
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Brown v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2010cv00488
Plaintiff:
Stacey L.D. Brown
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Graham v. Logan County of et al
as 5:2010cv01048
Plaintiff:
Stacey Graham
Defendant:
Logan County of, Randy Richardson and Rahmel Frances Jefferies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dix v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2010cv00324
Plaintiff:
Todd Stacey Dix
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hill v. Oklahoma City, City of et al
as 5:2010cv00715
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Hill
Defendant:
Oklahoma City, City of, Kenneth Jordan and Stacey Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mata v. Levick et al
as 5:2010cv00419
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mata
Defendant:
Roger Levick, Machelle Dickerson, Stacey Randolph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
