Cases 51 - 60 of 1,461
Ott v. Superintendent Wyoming Corr. Facility
as 6:2023cv06653
Petitioner:
Anthony Ott
Respondent:
Superintendent Wyoming Corr. Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Lilley
as 1:2023cv09613
Petitioner:
Terrell Jenkins
Respondent:
Superintendent Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caruthers v. Uhler
as 1:2023cv01124
Petitioner:
Michael Caruthers
Respondent:
Superintendent Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Irick v. Capra, Superintendent of Sing Sing Correctional Facility
as 1:2023cv09123
Petitioner:
Wilbur Irick
Respondent:
Michael Capra, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility and Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vanderhorst v. Titus
as 1:2023cv01066
Petitioner:
Jah-Lah Vanderhorst
Respondent:
Superintendent Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bemiss v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv01249
Petitioner:
Daniel Bemiss
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lang v. S.C.I. Sing Sing Superintendent et al
as 1:2023cv08627
Plaintiff:
Jamel Lang
Defendant:
S.C.I. Sing Sing Superintendent and Commissioner Daniel F. Martuscello, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latimore v. Schneider
as 1:2023cv08629
Petitioner:
Teddy T. Latimore
Respondent:
Superintendent Schneider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Parker v. Barometre
as 1:2023cv07331
Petitioner:
Bruce Parker
Respondent:
Superintendent D. Barometre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv01211
Petitioner:
Gary H. Moore
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
