Cases 51 - 60 of 136
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. et al v. Forti-Ahorrio et al
as 3:2014cv01098
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. , Sanrio, Inc. , Disney Enterprises, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Noel Forti-Ahorrio, Alberto Arango-Grinan , Bienvenido Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Sanrio, Inc. v. Bead & Bead et al
as 4:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Sanrio, Inc.
Defendant:
Bead & Bead, Gweon Eui Hong, Seon Yu and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Sanrio, Inc. v. Blink & Blink, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv08948
Defendant:
Blink & Blink, Inc., Does, Byung Soo Min and others
Plaintiff:
Sanrio, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07663
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DC Comics et al v. Casabona
as 1:2013cv20482
Plaintiff:
DC Comics , Disney Enterprises, Inc. and Sanrio, Inc.
Defendant:
Maria Casabona
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
DC Comics et al v. Omar Alejandro Gonzales et al
as 2:2012cv10462
Plaintiff:
DC Comics, Disney Enterprises Inc and Sanrio Inc
Defendant:
Does and Omar Alejandro Gonzales
DC Comics et al v. Stacey Parzik et al
as 2:2012cv09507
Plaintiff:
DC Comics, Disney Enterprises Inc, Hanna-Barbera Productions Inc and others
Defendant:
Does and Stacey Parzik
Disney Enterprises Inc et al v. United International Alex Inc et al
as 2:2012cv09104
Plaintiff:
Disney Enterprises Inc and Sanrio Inc
Defendant:
Does, Emad Guirgus and United International Alex Inc
Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Tran et al
as 3:2012cv05030
Plaintiff:
Disney Enterprises, Inc. , DC Comics and Sanrio, Inc.
Defendant:
Vuong Tran and Joey Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disney Enterprises Inc et al v. Jason Lancaster et al
as 2:2012cv07347
Plaintiff:
DC Comics, Disney Enterprises Inc and Sanrio Inc
Defendant:
Does, Jason Lancaster and Party Animals LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
