Cases 51 - 60 of 112
Faulk v. Medeiros
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2016cv11893
Petitioner:
Kenneth Faulk
Respondent:
Sean Medeiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitman v. Medeiros
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2016cv11931
Petitioner:
Darrin Whitman
Respondent:
Sean Medeiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierre v. Medeiros
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2016cv11843
Petitioner:
Carlo Pierre
Respondent:
Sean Medeiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Serrano v. Medeiros
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2016cv11808
Petitioner:
William Serrano
Respondent:
Sean Medeiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riley v. Medeiros
as 16-2121
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. RILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
SEAN MEDEIROS, Superintendent, MCI-Norfolk
Montero v. Medeiro
as 16-1924
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAMON MONTERO
Respondent - Appellee:
SEAN MEDEIROS, MCI Superintendent
Bianchi v. Medeiros
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2016cv11330
Petitioner:
Robert L. Bianchi
Respondent:
Sean Medeiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cadet v. Medeiros
as 1:2016cv10913
Petitioner:
Pierre Paul Cadet
Respondent:
Sean Medeiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watkins v. Medeiros
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2016cv10891
Petitioner:
Kyle Watkins
Respondent:
Sean Medeiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.