Cases 51 - 60 of 217
Bleil v. Unknown Named Staff of WRSP et al
as 2:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lawrence Bleil
Defendant:
Unknown Named Staff of WRSP, Unknown Named Staff and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paxton v. Staff
as 3:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
Jamar Paxton
Defendant:
Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Rosch et al
as 7:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Winston NaJee Reed
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Harold Clarke, Warden Jeffery Kiezer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iraheta v. Streeval et al
as 7:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Abraham Iraheta
Defendant:
Mr. Streeval and U.S.P. Lee Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hodges v. Perry et al
as 7:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
William Beverly Hodges, 4th
Defendant:
Lane Perry, Well Path Medical at Henry County Adult Detention Center, Chris Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paxton v. Richmond City Justice Center Staff
as 3:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Jamar Paxton
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boone v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail Medical Dept. Staff
as 1:2022cv00616
Plaintiff:
Earl B. Boone, Sr.
Defendant:
Western Tidewater Regional Jail Medical Dept. Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Paxton v. RCJC Staff
as 3:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jamar Paxton, Jr.
Defendant:
RCJC Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Staff 70 Building C.O.S Stith et al
as 1:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Cordarius Denard Burton
Defendant:
Staff 70 Building C.O.S Stith, Ms. Walker and Ms. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
