Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 51 - 60 of 744
Martinez v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 et al
as 0:2022cv00999
Plaintiff: Myriam Martinez
Defendant: AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3, AT&T Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association Trust and Sedgwick Claims Management
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Harris v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00937
Plaintiff: Max T. Harris
Defendant: 3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Higgins v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00786
Plaintiff: Sean T. Higgins
Defendant: 3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC, Aearo Holding, LLC and others
Olin v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00666
Plaintiff: Reed T. Olin
Defendant: 3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Yazzie v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00667
Plaintiff: Sean T. Yazzie
Defendant: 3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Welch v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00619
Plaintiff: Darrell T. Welch
Defendant: 3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00465
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Henderson v. Department of Correction et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv00345
Plaintiff: Mike C. Henderson
Defendant: Department of Correction, St. Peter Minnesota Hospital, c/o Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crow v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00130
Plaintiff: Justin T. Crow
Defendant: 3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Reichling v. Fikes We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv00081
Petitioner: Timmy J. Reichling
Respondent: T.J. Fikes, Dr. Lavalley Wood, Dr. Warlick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?