Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 51 - 60 of 84
SMITH v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY COMMON PLESE COURT et al
as 2:2016cv01132
Plaintiff: DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant: ALLEGHENY COUNTY COMMON PLESE COURT, PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS, MERCY BEHAIVOR HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. FBI
as 3:2016cv00165
Plaintiff: THOMAS SMITH
Defendant: FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. HASSEN et al
as 3:2016cv00075
Plaintiff: THOMAS SMITH
Defendant: ISSAC HASSEN, FBI, NORTHERN CAMBRIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. DOE
as 3:2016cv00004
Plaintiff: THOMAS SMITH
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. TEAMCARE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv03961
Plaintiff: NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: TEAMCARE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC , JESSICA SHENK, ERIN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
SMITH v. FBI
as 3:2015cv00184
Plaintiff: THOMAS SMITH
Defendant: FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. FBI et al
as 3:2014cv00198
Plaintiff: THOMAS SMITH
Defendant: FBI and NORTHERN CAMBRIA POLICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. NORTHERN CAMBRIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2014cv00180
Plaintiff: THOMAS SMITH
Defendant: NORTHERN CAMBRIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PLONKA v. WEAVER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01628
Plaintiff: Caroline A. Plonka
Defendant: Mary P. Weaver, The Zoning Hearing Board Of Sesuquhanna Boro, The Court Of Common Pleas For Susquehanna County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PLONKA v. WEAVER et al
as 2:2013cv03069
Plaintiff: CAROLINE A. PLONKA
Defendant: MARY P. WEAVER, THE ZONING HEARING BOARD OF SESUQUHANNA BORO, THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?