Cases 51 - 60 of 213
ROBINSON v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2019cv04667
Defendant:
OFFICER ROGERS., SGT. CURRAN and TAMMY FERGUSON
Plaintiff:
ROBBIE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2019cv04580
Defendant:
MANDY SIPPLE, JOHN WETZEL, TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. THOMPSON, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2019cv04521
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, SMART COMMUNICATIONS, TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Petitioner:
ROBERT L. HINES, III.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COOPER v. FERGUSON
as 2:2019cv04030
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BUNDY v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2019cv03865
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
NATHAN WINSTON BUNDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALSEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv03735
Defendant:
UNKNOW CORRECTIONS OFFICERS AT PENNSYLVANIA STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, JOHN E. WETZEL and TAMMY FERGUSON
Plaintiff:
MELVIN HALSEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLON v. FERGUSON et al
as 5:2019cv03475
Petitioner:
PEDRO COLON
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and TAMMY FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMPSON v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2019cv03455
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. THOMPSON
Defendant:
MANDY SIPPLE, C.E.R.T. TEAM, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONNER v. SIPPLE et al
as 2:2019cv03191
Defendant:
MR. BURKHOLDER, MS. MANDY SIPPLE, MR. D. HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENE THYE BONNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitney v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2019cv01250
Plaintiff:
Charles Whitney
Defendant:
Snowburger, Tammy Ferguson, Sgt. R. Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
