Cases 51 - 60 of 267
WILLIAMS v. TICE et al
as 5:2021cv05135
Petitioner:
ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NERO v. TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00183
Petitioner:
JOSEPH NERO
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF SOMERSET COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GIBBONS v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2021cv01210
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BARRY GIBBONS
Defendant:
BICKELL, RICH KUSTENBAUDER, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BOYD v. TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00158
Petitioner:
JOSHUA BOYD
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SOMERSET, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robins v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2021cv01474
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Robins
Defendant:
Secretary John Wetzel, Superintendent Salamon, Supervisor Tice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PENDLETON vs. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL
as 3:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDANT ERIC W. TICE and DAN CARO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WEYANT v. TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00145
Petitioner:
ROBERT WEYANT
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BANKS v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00144
Plaintiff:
DONALD BANKS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, E. Tice, JAMES C. BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MCINTOSH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv03375
Petitioner:
KEENAN MCINTOSH
Respondent:
JOHN E WETZEL, ERIC TICE, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. TICE
as 3:2021cv00125
Petitioner:
HUBERT JACKSON
Respondent:
ERIC TICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
