Cases 51 - 60 of 318
Jackson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv04305
Plaintiff:
Toni Jackson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gagliardi v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04027
Plaintiff:
Toni-Ann Gagliardi
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castro et al v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 2:2017cv03979
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Castro and Tony Castro
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elking et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv03746
Plaintiff:
Valerie Elking , Kimberly Winburn , Amada Wright and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCarthy et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03344
Plaintiff:
Treva McCarthy , Toni Adkison , Martha Anderson and others
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Endo Health Solutions Inc. , Astora Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Abbott et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02302
Plaintiff:
Donna Abbott , Machele Abbott , Anthony Akers and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. and Sperry Rail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Selley et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv02196
Plaintiff:
Tamara Selley and Tony Selley
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adkins v. Blackhawk Mining, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv12709
Plaintiff:
Kevin Adkins
Defendant:
Blackhawk Mining, LLC , Panther Creek Mining, LLC and Tony R. Osborne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
