Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 51 - 60 of 367
Wilson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02981
Plaintiff: Tony Wilson
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bernard et al v. City of Cleveland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01103
Plaintiff: Misty Golinar, Shainna Bernard, Jacob Carver and others
Defendant: City of Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, Officer Blue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02745
Respondent: Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Tony L. Harmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kirsh v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv02613
Plaintiff: Tony Kirsh
Defendant: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02142
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tony L McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01959
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tony Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher v. USA
as 2:2021cv01846
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Tony R Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carter v. USA
as 1:2021cv00803
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Tony O. Carter, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sperkowski v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01689
Defendant: Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff: Tony Sperkowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Ross et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00600
Defendant: Officer Ross, Owner Ken Babby and Akron Police Department
Plaintiff: Tony Taylor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?