Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04988
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00292
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 mn
Celestin v. U.S. Department State Bureau of Consular Affairs et al
as 1:2020cv00947
Defendant:
U.S. Department State Bureau of Consular Affairs and U.S. Embassy Port au Prince
Plaintiff:
George Beegmenton Celestin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Salem et al v. Pompeo et al
as 1:2019cv00363
Plaintiff:
Z.A. (a minor child), Sallam Yahia Moflah Zandani, Sharaf Mohsen and others
Defendant:
Larry Edward Andre, Devin Kennington, U.S. Department of State and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Saleh et al v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv05769
Plaintiff:
Huda Saleh, N.S., A.S. and others
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, U.S. Embassy, Djibouti, Donald Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv06800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07973
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
