Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Perkins v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 2:2012cv01202
Plaintiff:
Mark Harrison Perkins
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Tennant v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2012cv00227
Plaintiff:
David Alan Tennant
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Windley v. United States Marshals Service
as 2:2011cv02463
Petitioner:
George Calvin Windley
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aguilar-Martinez v. United States Marshals Service
as 4:2011cv00788
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Aguilar-Martinez
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cassidy v. United States Marshals Service
as 2:2011cv02326
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Cassidy
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Crow v. United States Marshals Service
as 2:2011cv02251
Petitioner:
Ivory Orey Crow
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gividen v. DeMarais et al
as 2:2011cv00188
Petitioner:
Joan Ada Gividen
Respondent:
Ann L DeMarais, David Bodily, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schipke v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2011cv00177
Plaintiff:
Mary Elizabeth Schipke
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Florence Correctional Center, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutierrez-Pineda v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 2:2011cv00059
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Gutierrez-Pineda
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service, Unknown Party, Charles Keeton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
