Cases 51 - 60 of 5,164
Myers et al. v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Micki Myers and Matthew Myers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Johnson v. United Nations and Member Status et al
as 2:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
Shereca Johnson
Defendant:
United Nations and Member Status, The Vatican and Vatican City and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Burns v. USA
as 4:2024cv00333
Petitioner:
Michael W. Burns
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
White v. USA
as 1:2024cv00340
Petitioner:
DeShawn A. White
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harris v. USA
as 4:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Bryan Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Collum v. USA
as 5:2024cv00323
Petitioner:
Terry M. Collum
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sheridan v. USA
as 5:2024cv00327
Petitioner:
Brandon L. Sheridan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wolfe v. USA
as 1:2024cv00328
Petitioner:
Bryan Shane Wolfe
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Schick v. Garland et al
as 2:2024cv00707
Defendant:
Wayne Schick, FBI, Merrick Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Allen Schick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Luster v. USA
as 5:2024cv00313
Petitioner:
Vernon M. Luster
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
