Cases 51 - 60 of 115
Terrance Adams v. Robert Stevenson, III
as 14-6197
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRANCE ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT M. STEVENSON, III, Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Harris v. South Carolina, State of
as 2:2013cv02755
Petitioner:
Albert T Harris
Respondent:
Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joe Gaillard v. Warden Broad River
as 13-6923
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE E. GAILLARD
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
James Bryant v. Warden Broad River
as 13-6558
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES A. BRYANT
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Lewis Fielder v. Robert Stevenson, III
as 13-6363
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEWIS WAYNE FIELDER
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT M. STEVENSON, III, Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
Michael Batchelor v. Broad River Correctional
as 13-6133
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL R. BATCHELOR
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Jeffcoat v. Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
as 8:2013cv00124
Petitioner:
Michael W Jeffcoat
Respondent:
Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gaillard v. Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
as 0:2012cv02962
Petitioner:
Joe E Gaillard
Respondent:
Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrett v. South Carolina, State of
as 5:2012cv02861
Petitioner:
Gary J Garrett
Respondent:
Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jonathan Johnson v. Warden, Broad River
as 12-7563
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
BILL BYARS, Director, SC Dept. of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.