Cases 51 - 60 of 203
Canada v. Antony et al
as 0:2021cv02204
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
Mathias Antony, Olmsted Community of Corrections, Chad Mitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albury et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02132
Plaintiff:
Todd Albury, Jonathan Adams, Rocky Ammerman and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Canada v. Olmsted County Community of Corrections et al
as 0:2021cv02120
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
Olmsted County Community of Corrections, Dept of Corrections Commissioner, Hearing & Release Unit Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv02098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Mays v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 0:2021cv02086
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Travis Yarbrough, Richard A. Waller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aitken et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv01758
Plaintiff:
Stephen Aitken, Edwin Among, Christopher Anderson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Travis v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 0:2021cv01424
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
James Travis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Kauffman et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv01311
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Frank Souther, Steven Repp and Travis Kauffman
Lestenkof et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv01313
Plaintiff:
Albert Lestenkof, Robert Lewis, Philip York and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Brenizer et al v. The County of Sherburne et al
as 0:2021cv01301
Defendant:
Joel Brott, Mark Frittle, The County of Sherburne and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle-William: Brenizer, Travis R. Fairbanks, Johnnie L. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
