Cases 51 - 60 of 1,608
Funk v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00513
Petitioner:
Derek Funk
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. O'Reilly Automotive Stores Inc et al
as 5:2023cv01026
Plaintiff:
Ronny Williams
Defendant:
O'Reilly Automotive Stores Inc doing business as O'Reilly Auto Parts No 182 and O'Reilly Automotive Inc doing business as O'Reilly Auto Parts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Williams v. Martinez
as 5:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Derrick Williams
Defendant:
Javier Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Lindsey et al
as 5:2023cv01011
Plaintiff:
Chad William Reed
Defendant:
Ron Lindsey, Taylor Williams, Tasha Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Murray v. Darwent et al
as 5:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Sean Murray
Defendant:
Jeremy Darwent and Mary Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKiddy v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2023cv00916
Plaintiff:
William McKiddy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thomsen v. Armfield et al
as 5:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
William C Thomsen
Defendant:
Cory Armfield, Cordell Police Dept and Cordell City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
