Cases 51 - 56 of 56
Jonathan Edmisten v. Roger Werholtz
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 08-3021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN J. EDMISTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU HOANG, ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary, Kansas Department of Corrections, in his official and private capacity, DAVID R MC KUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, in his official and private capacity and others
Long v. Roberts
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 07-3326
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARLIN D. LONG
Respondent - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility
Warden v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2007cv01569
Plaintiff:
Robert Warden
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Requena v. Roberts, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 07-3282
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADRIAN M. REQUENA
Respondent - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Gruenwald v. Maddox, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 07-3245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAUNCEY GRUENWALD
Defendant - Appellee:
LEONARD MADDOX, SST-COI, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in his official and private capacity, JASON MYERS, SST-DOII, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in his official and private capacity, ROLAND BUCHANAN, SST-COI, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in his official and private capacity and others
Warden v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2007cv05332
Plaintiff:
Robert Warden
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.