Cases 51 - 60 of 22,001
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Daughtry
as 1:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
James Blake Daughtry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Hudson v. Openly LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Jay Hudson
Defendant:
Openly LLC and Rock Ridge Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Bruno v. Crabtree (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Damion Joseph Bruno
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Canidate v. Walmart, Inc., et al
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Monique Roshaun Canidate and Monique R. Canidate
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Walmart, Inc. doing business as Walmart Store No. 930 and Christopher Hollands
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williams v. Bynum (INMATE 2)
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Williams
Defendant:
Mason Bynum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Danae Brown and Amanda Andrews
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment/Reemployment Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Luther v. Alatex Network Services, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Christen Luther
Defendant:
Alatex Network Services and Roy Fryer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
