Cases 51 - 60 of 9,569
LUFKIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
NILDA LUFKIN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bentley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Frances Bentley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
CLARK v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
SHINEKA CLARK
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
SMITH v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
SHANNON SMITH
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Hollifield v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Janey Hollifield
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
KOSTUCK v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
JACE KOSTUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
TRUITT v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
GEORGE TRUITT
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Carpenter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Patrika Carpenter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Wyant v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Isaac Wyant
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
