Cases 61 - 70 of 66,545
Winding RESTRICTED FILER v. McClure
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding *RESTRICTED FILER*
Defendant:
Marc McClure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Shires et al
as 3:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Banks
Defendant:
James Shires and Y.C.S. Dept.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chavez v. Warden, FCI La Tuna, FBOP
as 3:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Raul Chavez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI La Tuna, FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morales v. Dawson County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Josue Morales
Respondent:
Dawson County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeBorde v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv01371
Petitioner:
Christopher DeBorde
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vargas v. Rivers
as 4:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Joel Vargas
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Edwards v. Director-TDCJ
as 3:2024cv00956
Petitioner:
Stephen Anthoney Edwards
Respondent:
Director-TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lazzarino v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00396
Petitioner:
Anthony Lazzarino
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morgan v. Rosalez
as 1:2024cv00408
Petitioner:
Gatlin Gary Morgan
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. Mayorkas
as 4:2024cv01389
Petitioner:
Rodney Lee Thompson
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
