Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Nagle v. Jorgenson et al
as 1:2008cv00432
Plaintiff:
Adam H. Nagle
Defendant:
FNU Jorgenson and Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Proverb v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al
as 1:2008cv00431
Plaintiff:
David R. Proverb
Defendant:
Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent, William Scurry, FNU Duclose and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adams et al v. J. Myers Builders, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00425
Plaintiff:
Tracy Adams and Paul Adams
Defendant:
J. Myers Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Nagle v. NH State Prison et al
as 1:2008cv00413
Plaintiff:
Adam H. Nagle
Defendant:
NH State Prison and FNU Parent
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Becker v. Blightler et al
as 1:2008fp00185
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Defendant:
Margaret Blightler, Michael B. Mukasey, David H. Souter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker et al v. Thibco, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00039
Plaintiff:
Kim Walker, Colin Pilcher, Adam Teal and others
Defendant:
Thibco, Inc. and Gerard L. Thibodeau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Adam v. Hensely
as 1:2007cv00338
Plaintiff:
Richard Adam
Defendant:
Thomas Arthur Hensley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
McKinnie v. Eddie Nash & Sons, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00193
Plaintiff:
Richard D. McKinnie
Defendant:
Eddie Nash & Sons, Inc., Susan Camille Nash and Adam W. Hurd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Cook et al v. City of Concord
as 1:2007cv00100
Plaintiff:
Brian H. Cook, Michael W. Kulak, Steven L. Martel and others
Defendant:
Concord, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
