Cases 61 - 70 of 143
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Armstrong v. Ashtabula County Jail
as 1:2016cv03020
Petitioner:
Richard Armstrong
Respondent:
Ashtabula County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armstrong et al v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen - NS Southern Lines GCA et al
as 1:2016cv01664
Plaintiff:
Armstrong, Nicholas D Davis, Mathew C Taylor and others
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen - NS Southern Lines GCA, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen -- NS Eastern Lines GCA and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Sherfey et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00776
Plaintiff:
Chad Sherfey , Barbara Simpson , Mark Farlow and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Armstrong v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
as 1:2015cv00783
Petitioner:
Britton R. Armstrong
Respondent:
Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armstrong v. Astrab
as 3:2015cv01891
Plaintiff:
Shawn Armstrong
Defendant:
Michael K. Astrab
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 3:2015cv00289
Plaintiff:
Jennifer N Armstrong
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hall et al v. Shoe Show, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01070
Plaintiff:
Tina Liprynce Hall and Raynell Armstrong
Defendant:
Shoe Show, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Armstrong v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01562
Plaintiff:
Amy Armstrong
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
