Cases 61 - 70 of 150
Sheehan v. Van Skyock et al
as 9:2015cv00094
Plaintiff:
Mark Duane Sheehan
Defendant:
Sandy Van Skyock, Troy Scribner, Brian Josephson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daforno v. Opper et al
as 4:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Nicole Daforno
Defendant:
Richard Opper, Martin Vining and Sarah Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbman v. Kerr
as 1:2014cv00153
Plaintiff:
Martin R. Hubbman
Defendant:
Isaiah J. Kerr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marceau v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
Martin Marceau
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Fratzke et al v. Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks et al
as 9:2014cv00274
Plaintiff:
Ross Fratzke and Debora Fratzke
Defendant:
Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks , Martin Spring , Thomas Chianelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Ployhar et al
as 9:2014cv00263
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Martin Jeffrey Ployhar, Donna Ployhar, John P. Ployhar and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
The Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation, Montana et al v. Roberts et al
as 4:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
The Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation, Montana , Plain Green and First American Capital Resources
Defendant:
Zachary Roberts, Richard Lee Broome, Gordon Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Connell v. Frink et al
as 9:2014cv00213
Petitioner:
Michael P. O'Connell
Respondent:
Martin Frink and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin et al v. Drumlummon Gold
as 2:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
Cy Martin and Erik Larsen
Defendant:
Drumlummon Gold
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Keller v. Frink et al
as 9:2014cv00173
Petitioner:
Jerry Lee Keller
Respondent:
Martin Frink and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
