Cases 61 - 70 of 111
USA v. $71,023.42 seized from United Shoreline Federal Credit Union Savings Account Number XXXXXXX50-01 et al
as 3:2016cv00154
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$71,023.42 seized from United Shoreline Federal Credit Union Savings Account Number XXXXXXX50-01, $16,620.23 seized from United Shoreline Federal Credit Union Savings Account Number XXXXXX70-01, $84,933.86 seized from United Shoreline Federal Credit Union Savings Account Number XXXXXXX00-01 and others
Claimant:
Milagros Diaz Velez
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carolina v. Lambert et al
as 3:2015cv00489
Plaintiff:
Tyrone D. Carolina
Defendant:
Lambert, Diaz, Rule and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Colvin et al
as 3:2015cv00280
Plaintiff:
Sephora Diaz
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sun Life Assurance Co of Canada v. Diaz et al
as 3:2014cv01685
Plaintiff:
Sun Life Assurance Co of Canada
Defendant:
Bruce Diaz, Jerry Diaz, Tomas Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00859
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Frayne et al
as 3:2014cv00380
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Diaz
Defendant:
Mark A. Frayne, Gerard Gagne, Jr. and Debbie Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Arnone et al
as 3:2014cv00323
Plaintiff:
Ivan Diaz
Defendant:
Leo C. Arnone, Kelly, Lance Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
