Cases 61 - 70 of 158
Andrew Jones v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 20-3137
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW JONES
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv96262
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv88448
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv52203
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv38186
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Everett Russ v. TDOC, et al
as 20-5316
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW JONES, JERRY WARDLOW, Assistant Warden, TOM P. THOMPSON, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVERETT L. RUSS
Defendant:
TDOC
Utz v. Crotts et al
as 1:2020cv01063
Defendant:
FNU Scott, Latasha Beard, FNU Woods and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Utz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ernest Miller v. Judy Hanh
as 2:2020cv02422
Defendant:
Sheila Miller, Dennis Duffield, Andrew Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia II v. Connon et al
as 1:2020cv00566
Defendant:
Chapplain Brooks, Andrew Jones, Chapplain H. Connon and others
Plaintiff:
Max E. Garcia II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13553
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP ANDREW JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
