Cases 61 - 70 of 194
Penny v. PNC Bank, N.A.
as 1:2019cv00006
Plaintiff:
Joanne Ermandine Penny, Jesse L. Keough, Steven J. Cabanas and others
Defendant:
PNC Bank, N.A., Pinnacle Capital Mortgage Corporation, Laura Nomura and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00475
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dano v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00434
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Dana Ann Dano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00364
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00332
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McTigue v. Kobayashi et al
as 1:2018cv00275
Petitioner:
Jennifer Ann McTigue
Respondent:
Christine Hilliard, Lucy Zhang, H. Kobayashi and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00145
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc., Albert S.N. Hee, Randall Y.C. Ho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Myrland v. Gillmor et al
as 1:2018cv00120
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Myrland
Defendant:
Helen Gillmor, Rebecca Ann Perlmutter and Derek Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jaentsch v. Puha et al
as 1:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
Keoni Richard Jaentsch
Defendant:
Pattie-Ann K. Puha, Raquel Taguchi and Yumi Suzuki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
