Cases 61 - 70 of 1,378
Perry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
Melissa Ann Perry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Bishop v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02289
Plaintiff:
Ashlee Elizabeth Ann Bishop
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanders v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
Tanesha Ann Sanders
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Berekmeri v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01963
Defendant:
Mary Ann Berekmeri, Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Prows v. City of Oxford et al
as 1:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Tate David Prows and Ann Prows
Defendant:
City of Oxford, Laura Borso, Sam Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Folley v. Merz et al
as 1:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Derek Folley
Defendant:
Hon. Michael R. Merz, Esq. William H. Lamb, Esq. Mary Anne Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iceman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00877
Plaintiff:
Victoria Ann Iceman
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
