Cases 61 - 70 of 967
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Petition for Hearing on Naturalization Application
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Baker v. Seeley et al
as 3:2022cv05584
Plaintiff:
Jamall S Baker
Defendant:
Camden Crouse, Trent Eisenbeisz, Chris Hallgren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sahm v. Ali et al
as 2:2022cv01131
Plaintiff:
Teri Kealoha Sahm
Defendant:
Karim Ali, Jagroop Singh, Seth Goodstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fraud
Malcolm v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05574
Plaintiff:
Christina Ann Malcolm
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Danner et al
as 3:2022cv05544
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
David W Danner and Ann Rendahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Petition for Hearing on Naturalization Application
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Unlawful Employment Practices
Ard v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03081
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Ard
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
