Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Hendricks v. Aramark Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02015
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hendricks
Defendant:
Aramark Inc, Ms. Williams, Ms. Stoner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparal Inc
as 2:2014cv01915
Plaintiff:
Zambrina A. Marshall
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparal Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Strickland v. Aramark Corporation, et al
as 1:2014cv01260
Plaintiff:
Tanya Strickland
Defendant:
Gregory S. Robinson , Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership , Aramark Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shanks v. ARAMARK Healthcare Support Services, LLC
as 1:2014cv00298
Plaintiff:
Richard Shanks
Defendant:
ARAMARK Healthcare Support Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brewster v. Aramark Correctional Services
as 2:2014cv00273
Plaintiff:
Gary A. Brewster
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services
Movant:
Karl C. Wetherby, Joseph Rickard and Jonathan E. Kiste
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coleman v. Aramark Correctional Services
as 3:2013cv01120
Plaintiff:
Marcus Coleman
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Johnson v. Muskingum Co. Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A. Johnson
Defendant:
Muskingum Co. Sheriff's Dept. , Matthew Lutz , Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jackson v. Aramark et al
as 1:2011cv01951
Plaintiff:
Vincent W. Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark, Lorain County Jail and Cheryl Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00635
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
