Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Schmidt v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al
as 4:2009cv00044
Plaintiff:
Christopher B Schmidt
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions Inc, Pinnacle Credit Services, LLC, Palisades Collection LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hoge et al v. Heinert et al
as 1:2009cv00043
Plaintiff:
Todd I Hoge, Jourdain H St Cyr, James B Gross, I and others
Defendant:
Pat Heinert, Lisa Wicks, Greg Bohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Young et al
as 1:2009mc00020
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Donald Anthony Walker Young, Acorn Capitol Management LLC, Acorn II LP and others
Darby v. Redmann et al
as 3:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
Vonnie Darin Darby
Defendant:
Don Redmann and B Dreher
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Darby v. Redmann et al
as 3:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
Vonnie Darin Darby
Defendant:
Don Redmann, B Dreher and Jennifer Peoppel
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gleeson v. McDonald
as 3:2008cv00126
Plaintiff:
George J Gleeson
Defendant:
Joy McDonald, Paul Hutter, James Terry and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Geokinetics USA, Inc. v. Marmon et al
as 4:2008cv00104
Plaintiff:
Geokinetics USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Wayne H. Marmon and Brenda B. Marmon
Cause Of Action: Diversity
White Body Jr v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2008cv00101
Petitioner:
Timothy White Body, Jr
Respondent:
Michael B Mukasey, Harley G Lappin, Blake R Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Holbach v. Murphy et al
as 4:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
Mitchell David Holbach
Defendant:
Nancy Murphy, Dan Strandberg, Kristen Plessas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Erickson v. Erickson
as 3:2008mc00003
Plaintiff:
Norman B. Erickson, III
Defendant:
Jeannine Faye Erickson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
