Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 61 - 70 of 135
MODRALL v. JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01566
Plaintiff: ROBERT G. MODRALL
Defendant: JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, PETER LEWIS, SARAH COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BAKER v. U.S. HOUSING AUTHORITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01017
Plaintiff: STANLEY BAKER
Defendant: U.S. HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WATTS v. PHILLIP et al
as 1:2016cv00999
Plaintiff: RALPH L. WATTS
Defendant: ROBERT F. PHILLIP, GARY A. BACON, BAKER MCGEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BOYLE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00998
Plaintiff: DAVID L. SMITH
Defendant: TERRENCE W. BOYLE, MICHAEL F. EASLEY and JOHN H. BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED et al v. BENNETT JONES, LLP
as 1:2016mc00960
Movant: BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED , BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS, INC. , PEGASI ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. and others
Respondent: BENNETT JONES, LLP
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
BAKER v. REYNOLDS et al
as 1:2016cv00799
Plaintiff: ERIE BAKER
Defendant: SIBLEY REYNOLDS, STATE OF ALABAMA and BILL FRANKLYN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. WMATA
as 1:2016cv00243
Defendant: WMATA
Plaintiff: DENNEAN BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00115
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BUSTILLO v. DANIELS, et al
as 1:2016cv00051
Plaintiff: FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Defendant: CHARLES DANIELS, DAVID LUKENS, J. SAWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSTILLO v. DANIELS, et al
as 1:2015cv02143
Plaintiff: FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Defendant: CHARLES DANIELS, DAVID LUKENS, J. SAWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?