Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Bowen et al v. BC Builders, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00168
Plaintiff:
Dennis Bowen and Vicki Bowen
Defendant:
BC Builders, LLC , A&P Concrete and Pools, LLC , Clay Tramonte and others
Counter_defendant:
Dennis Bowen and Vicki Bowen
Counter_claimant:
BC Builders, LLC , Clay Tramonte and Robert Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baldwin et al v. Fresenius USA Inc et al
as 5:2016cv00239
Plaintiff:
Ronald Baldwin , Jacqueline Bowens , Kevin Jefferson and others
Defendant:
Fresenius USA Inc , Fresenius USA Manufacturing Inc , Fresenius USA Marketing Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barnes et al v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
Tabatha Barnes , Terri Morris , Syrita Bowen and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of , Daniel Holtzclaw, Bill Citty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mull v. Bowen
as 5:2015cv00475
Plaintiff:
Elise Mull
Defendant:
Cheryl Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bowen v. Whipple et al
as 4:2015cv00006
Plaintiff:
William Lee Bowen
Defendant:
Scott William Whipple and TIGA Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bowens v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2014cv00539
Plaintiff:
Evonne E Bowens
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bowen v. Whipple et al
as 6:2014cv00337
Plaintiff:
William Lee Bowen
Defendant:
Scott William Whipple and TIGA Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bey v. Bowen et al
as 5:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Abdul Ayat Mohammed Bey
Defendant:
Mark Bowen and Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bowens v. Van Dyck et al
as 5:2012cv01120
Plaintiff:
Tristian Don Bowens
Defendant:
Richard Van Dyck and Timothy A Brauer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
